|
March 18, 2003
Statement before the Landmarks
Preservation Commission
In support of the Proposed Gansevoort Market Historic District
The Historic Districts Council is
the citywide advocate for New York’s designated historic districts
and for neighborhoods meriting preservation. The designation of
a historic neighborhood as a historic district is almost always
HDC’s preferred method of protecting that neighborhood, and
we are thrilled to have the opportunity to support the Landmarks
Preservation Commission’s courageous designation of this district
today. Webster’s Dictionary calls courage, “the response
of facing and dealing with anything recognized as difficult, instead
of withdrawing from it”. Designating Gansevoort Market may
be considered difficult by some. The architecture of this district
is not classically beautiful – this is an area that has seen
an enormous amount of use and alteration. It’s a market neighborhood
after all, and markets by their nature go through evolution and
change. There are even some wags who maintain that the neighborhood
is somehow not “worthy” of being designated ~ a most
unfortunate column on the Gotham Gazette website has a lot of fun
calling the area “a smelly old neighborhood where they hang
pieces of dead cows”. There will be people who question the
LPC’s intention on this proposal, there always are.
People may be concerned about property rights and oversight –
some how, 38 years of successful and just regulation of designated
properties is not sufficient to convince everyone that the rights
of building owners of historic properties are not summarily eliminated.
Some people may have concerns that designation will hinder the economic
growth of the neighborhood. However, both anecdotal observations
of areas such as Ladies’ Mile, SoHo, Tribeca, Fort Greene,
and St. George, and economic studies sponsored by numerous groups,
including New York City’s Independent Budget Office, have
proven to these concerns to be baseless. This should not be a revelation
as two of the stated purposes of the Landmarks Law are to “stabilize
and improve property values in historic districts” and “strengthen
the City’s economy”. Preservation is an accepted tool
for economic development in municipalities throughout the world,
which even includes New York City.
There might be concerns that current businesses will no longer be
able to operate in the neighborhood. This concern essentially relates
to changes in zoning and usage, which are issues not under the mandate
of the LPC. Furthermore, these issues are not even considered by
the Commission when reviewing applications for the proposed developments
in designated areas.
Finally, there may be even some
evidence of jealousy that other areas of the city are not being
designated. While there is a disparity in the amount of designated
properties on a borough-wide scale, that is no reason for this important
designation to go forward. HDC remains certain that the LPC will
designate all deserving neighborhoods and properties within the
city in due time, particularly within suburban neighborhoods in
the outlying boroughs. We encourage other advocates to follow the
example set by the Save Gansevoort Task Force, and offer as much
aid and information to the over-burdened research staff as possible,
as well as advocating to their supportive elected representatives
for increased funds for the Landmarks Commission so that the agency
can properly meet all the requests from interested and deserving
communities.
The decision to designate Gansevoort Market is not difficult, however,
when based on the merits and qualifications of the neighborhood
as mandated by the Landmarks Law. The law requires that a landmark
site “has a special character or special historical or aesthetic
interest or value as part of the development, heritage, or cultural
characteristics of the city, state, or nation.” By these considerations,
the decision to preserve this area as a designated historic district
is obvious.
Few other areas in New York City
evidence as strong a “character” as Gansevoort, and
there is no other place in New York (that I can name) where so much
of the development and history of the city as a maritime and mercantile
center is visible right there on the surface. The details of the
streetscape – the exposed Belgian block streets, the loading
docks of the buildings, the High Line – all combine to create
a distinct sense of place that is at once redolent with history
and brimming with active life. Gansevoort is robed in its history,
the individual buildings work together with the streets to create
a well-worn, realistic tableaux of historical New York. It is a
courageous move for the Landmark Commission to act to protect this
neighborhood, which could so easily be compromised into non-existence.
For districts whose principal characteristic is historic –
as opposed to districts who are principally architectural such as
SoHo – the sense of place is that much more fragile, and future
development requires that much more fore-thought and guidance. The
results of successful development within historic neighborhoods
can be seen citywide. Unfortunately, so can the results of unsuccessful
development and the deciding factor between successful development
and disastrous abomination in a historic neighborhood is almost
always the careful and diligent work of the Landmarks Commission.
HDC hopes that the LPC will be soon
be able to apply that care and diligence to the areas excluded in
this first phase of the historic district. While there are many
voices and many agencies involved in the final fate of the High
Line, the structure itself is not a sculpture in a gallery, but
rather a vital part of the historic Gansevoort Market. Excluding
the High Line and the properties around it from the designated neighborhood
is like architecturally considering only three walls of a room –
it works well on stage but not in reality. It is HDC’s great
hope that the LPC will be able to complete this designation soon,
and extend the Gansevoort Market district to its natural western
boundary. We strongly applaud this first step, and commend the community
for recognizing this important resource, and the Landmarks Commission
for acting to protect it.
Return to Recent
Testimony
|