| E-BULLETIN
OF THE HISTORIC DISTRICTS COUNCIL
January 2008, Volume 5 Number 1
HAPPY NEW YEAR!
With the start of this New Year, HDC is pleased to announce
the “Best of 2007,” a list of notable preservation victories
in New York City over the past twelve months. That’s
right—as we usher in 2008, we’re following the tradition
of media outlets both big and small to name our choices for the
most monumental events that shaped and shook the preservation community
in 2007. From the designation of new historic districts to the successful
cross-borough collaborations of community groups, HDC is pleased
to highlight a very short list of the many critical efforts to defend
the unique sense of place of our neighborhoods and our city.
In no particular order, here is our “Best of 2007,”
HDC’s picks for the some of the biggest preservation
successes of the past year:
· The Designation of the Sunnyside
Gardens Historic District
As grassroots activists create new campaign and advocacy tactics,
the preservation toolbox continues to grow. Yet official designation
by the LPC
still remains the preservationist’s holy grail, which is just
one reason why the designation of the Sunnyside
Gardens Historic District makes our shortlist this year.
Now the largest historic district in Queens, with over 620 residential
structures, Sunnyside Gardens owes its designation to the unwavering
support of preservation advocates, elected officials, and of course,
its local neighborhood organization, the Sunnyside
Gardens Preservation Alliance. Despite ongoing opposition
from a small but vocal minority, the community remained focused
and guided their designation through to the very end.
Of course, 2007 saw the successes of a number of other long-term
preservation campaigns with the designations of the Crown
Heights North (phase 1), DUMBO,
and Eberhart
Faber Pencil Company Historic Districts, as well as the
designations of McCarren
Pool and two
federal row houses on Grand Street, among others, as individual
landmarks. And though not an official city historic district yet,
the proposed Fiske Terrace-Midwood
Park neighborhood was finally heard in front of the commission
and is awaiting designation. Send a statement of support for this
district to comments@lpc.nyc.gov.
For more information on these neighborhoods, visit our Neighborhood
at Risk and click
here to learn about HDC’s choices for the most significant
“Heard but not Designated” structures (a list which
has dwindled from twenty-one to twelve unprotected properties in
only two years!).
LPC has taken an active approach to increasing the number of landmark
designations over the past year, and a large number of them have
occurred in the outer boroughs. This is thanks in large part to
the commission’s increased budget, which allowed new survey
staff members to be hired. In May, HDC joined with other preservation
organizations throughout the city to hold a Preservation
Lobby Day on the steps of city to rally to allocate an additional
$1 million dollars to the LPC’s annual budget.
· Brooklyn CM Bill De Blasio Supports Special Limited
Height Restriction in Cobble Hill Historic District
An addition
atop the former Independence Bank Building on the corner
of Court Street and Atlantic Avenue in the Cobble
Hill Historic District proposed by developer Two Trees caused
quite a stir this year. After some design modifications, the
LPC approved the
proposal but the plan still required several
zoning waivers from the City Planning Commission, including
eliminating the rear yard to build to the back of the property line
and allowing the building to rise to 60 feet in a 50 foot maximum
height limited zone. These permissions were fought against at City
Planning by a strong coalition of community activists and preservationists,
including the Cobble Hill Association, the Brooklyn
Heights Association, the Society for the Architecture of
the City and HDC. In addition, we were joined in opposition by Brooklyn
Community Board Six and Brooklyn Borough
President Marty Markowitz. Unfortunately, local Council
Member Bill de Blasio was supportive of the waivers and
had testified in favor of them at the City Planning hearing. However,
after several meetings with CM de Blasio, we successfully made the
case that the height variance had the potential to set a very dangerous
precedent citywide for all of the city’s historic districts
and he asked
his colleagues at the City Council to decline permission for the
height waiver, which they did. HDC is proud of our neighborhood
partners in Brooklyn for their successful advocacy and very grateful
to CM de Blasio for his open mind on the issue, open-door policy
to community members and willingness to re-examine the situation.
Winning CM De Blasio’s support was an essential step in ensuring
the integrity of this Limited Height District. Which is why, to
facilitate the future exposure of elected officials to current preservation
and land use concern, HDC launched the League of Preservation Voters
Initiative in February. Beginning during the special election for
the local council seat in Brooklyn’s
District 40, HDC and the Coalition of Concerned Preservation
Voters in the 40th District sponsored a public forum with candidates
for the District’s special election and released a corresponding
Voter Guide. Candidates discussed important preservation and development
concerns including questions of landmark designation, community
rezoning and building codes within the district.
As the 2009 municipal elections approach, HDC hopes to host similar
forums in contended districts throughout the city. These forums
will be nonpartisan and will not endorse any specific candidates.
Rather, the goal here is to expose to the public the amount of knowledge
candidates have on these issues, and to likewise demonstrate that
these are genuine concerns of communities throughout the city. To
read the sample Voter Guide released in February, and to check out
the candidate’s responses, please
click here.
The precedent is a positive one. Dr. Mathieu Eugene, the winner
and new council member, has since been supportive, listing “Neighborhood
Preservation” as one of his top priorities and having testified
in favor of a handful of proposed landmarks in front of the Landmarks
Preservation Commission.
· Historic Preservation Proven as a Green Practice
At HDC’s Annual
Preservation Conference this past March, keynote speaker
Donovan Rypkema of PlaceEconomics
argued that historic preservation is one of the most effective components
of sustainable development. The adaptive reuse of older structures
proves overwhelmingly beneficial to local economies and local environments
in a variety of ways, from the employment of local workers to rehabilitate
existing properties to the significant reduction of waste compared
to that generated during demolition. Even the simple use of newer,
mass-produced building materials can be wasteful: nearly a third
of the windows replaced each year are less than ten years old, and
the energy consumed in manufacturing them ranges from 40 times (vinyl)
to 126 times (aluminum) that used for wood. Once they are scrapped,
the landfill space the old windows take, to say nothing of the energy
consumed getting them there, compounds the waste. Read the full
text of the speech here.
With the foundation set by Mr. Rypkema, the program for our 2008
Preservation Conference will further examine the future
of historic preservation. With Mayor Bloomberg’s PlaNYC
2030 as our starting point, HDC will gather a host of planners,
advocates and professionals to dissect the Plan and it’s implications
for our city’s future. Is preservation included in the Mayor’s
vision for the future of New York? How can we make sure that preservation
principles are incorporated into efforts to accommodate an additional
one million people over then next two decades? Check your mailbox
for full conference details later this month and in the meantime
be sure to save March 7-9, 2008 on your calendars!
· 980 Madison Avenue Tower Quashed
2007 was a year of collaboration. Rather than being limited to
issues rooted in their surrounding blocks, New Yorkers concerned
with preservation and land-use issues throughout the city banded
together to support causes throughout the boroughs. These collaborations
generated a collective voice loud enough to effectively advocate
against various proposals. One such example was the application
to erect two glass towers atop the Parke-Bernet Building at 980
Madison Avenue. 9 out of 10 Landmarks Commissioners stated that
they felt, regardless of the merits of the design, it was simply
proposed for the wrong place. There has been extensive
press coverage of the decision and see
here for a full report. We are incredibly appreciative for
all the support from the 84 groups who signed on in opposition to
this project, and for the Landmarks Commissioners for their articulate
and thoughtful consideration of this project which led them to the
right decision. The only cloud on the horizon is that the agency
didn’t reject the proposal outright, and it
might come back in an altered form, but given the strong
words of the Commissioners and the intense public interest, we are
hopeful that any new application will have to start the process
afresh.
For the record, here are the groups that stood in opposition:
thank you all!
10th & Stuyvesant Streets Block Association, Bay Improvement
Group, Bayside Civic Database, Boerum Hill Association, Brooklyn
Borough Historian's Office, Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy, Brooklyn
Heights Association, Brownstone Revival Coalition, Building Conservation
International, Cambridge Place Action Coalition, Carnegie Hill Neighbors,
Center Development Corporation, Center for Thanatology, Central
Park West Preservation Committee, Civitas, Committee To Save The
Trylon Theater, Concerned Citizens of Greenwood Heights, Council
of Chelsea Block Associations, Crown Heights North Association,
Defenders of the Historic Upper East Side, Ditmas Park Association,
Drive to Protect the Ladies' Mile District, DUMBO Neighborhood Association,
East 78th Street Block Association Park/ Lex., East 85th/86th Lex-Park-Mad
Block Association, East 86th Street Merchants/Residents Association,
East Midtown Coalition for Sensible Development, East Village Community
Coalition, Fort Greene Association, Four Borough Neighborhood Preservation
Alliance, Friends of First Avenue Estate, Friends of Historic New
Utrecht, Friends of Terra Cotta, Friends of the Upper East Side
Historic Districts, Fulton Ferry Landing Association, Gramercy Neighborhood
Associates, Greater Astoria Historical Society, Greenwich Village
Community Task Force, Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation,
Historic Districts Council, Historic Neighborhood Enhancement Alliance,
Institute of Classical Architecture & Classical America, Jackson
Heights Beautification Group, Jackson Heights Garden City Society,
Landmark West!, Manhattan Community Board 8, Manhattan East Community
Association, Metropolitan Historic Structures Association, Modern
Architecture Working Group, Municipal Art Society, Murray Hill Neighborhood
Association, National Trust for Historic Preservation, New York
Landmarks Conservancy, New York Marble Cemetery, New York Preservation
Alliance, New Yorkers for Responsible Development, NoHo Neighborhood
Association, North Shore Waterfront Greenbelt, Parkway Village Historical
Society, Preservation League of Staten Island, Preserve and Protect,
Queensborough Preservation League, Rego-Forest Preservation Council,
Richmond Hill Historical Society, Riverdale Historic District, Roosevelt
Island Historical Society, Senator Street Historic District, Serpentine
Art and Nature Commons, Society for Clinton Hill, Society for the
Architecture of the City, SoHo Alliance, Sunnyside Foundation for
Community Planning and Preservation, Tribeca Community Association,
Turtle Bay Association, Union Square Community Coalition, Vinegar
Hill Neighborhood Association, West 122nd St. Block Association,
West 54 - 55 Street Block Association, West Brighton Restoration
Society, West Cunningham Park Civic Association, Westerleigh Improvement
Association, Wyckoff House & Association, Yorkville Historic
Society.
Without support from community groups beyond the neighborhood immediately
affected in this instance, such an advocacy effort could not have
been as effective. The continued collaboration of preservation-minded
individuals and organizations is essential to the fight to preserve
the integrity of our city’s historic character. To formalize
the establishment of such a citywide network, in November HDC launched
its new Neighborhood Partners Program. This free program aims to
positively influence and shape the future both of our neighborhoods
and of the entire city by creating a unified voice for preservation
and land use issues. (For more information, please contact Lauren
Belfer, HDC’s Community Coordinator, at lbelfer@hdc.org
or 212.614.9107, extension 14.)
· Historic Duffield Street Residence Spared from Eminent
Domain Efforts
Sometimes you can catch lighting in a bottle. In 2004, when Joy
Chatel learned that her mid-19th century rowhouse at 227 Duffield
Street in Downtown Brooklyn was to be seized for demolition by the
City as part of the Downtown
Brooklyn rezoning plan, she began a tireless campaign to
preserve the building against enormous odds. In addition to her
personal connection to the historic building, local legend connected
the house and its neighbors with the Underground Railroad and the
mid-19th
Century Abolitionist Movement. Thanks to Joy’s indomitable
spirit and ceaseless efforts, she gathered support from a wide array
of community members and organizations, as well as out-spoken champions
in public official such as Council members Tony Avella, Charles
Barron and Letitia James. Thanks to their support, the City sponsored
a
study of the properties which showed a direct link with
prominent Abolitionists and recommended that further research into
this important and largely-invisible social history. Finally in
December 2007, after years of struggle and two different eminent
domain hearings, the City reversed its decision to demolish the
home for a parking lot and announced its plan to look into re-use
options for the site. Jennifer Levy of South
Brooklyn Legal Services, who brought the legal action against
the City which resulted in this outcome, put it best when she said
“I commend the City for their flexibility. They have shown
that it is possible to do development thoughtfully, in a manner
that is responsive to community concerns, and with an eye to preserving
our history.” We applaud Joy, Jennifer and everyone else involved
in the campaign to preserve these houses for their passion, dedication
and fortitude, Hopefully, decision-makers will learn from this that
flexibility and community concerns are pivotal in guiding appropriate
development within our historic city. There are certainly enough
opportunities coming up to exercise this new wisdom; from Admiral’s
Row to Moynihan
Station to (dare we hope?) Atlantic
Yards…
Friends of HDC provide critical support for HDC’s advocacy,
education and outreach initiatives. To join us as a Friend or to
learn more please visit our website here. Thank you for your support.
To unsubscribe from the email list please email
hdc@hdc.org and write "Unsubscribe" in the
subject heading. We’ll miss you!
|