| Recent hdc
testimony at
the landmarks preservation commission
(Click to enlarge pictures)
Click here to access
the full archive of HDC testimony
2/5/2008
Item 5
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN
084898- Block 149, lot 7-
87-89 Chambers Street - TriBeCa South Historic District
An Italianate style store and loft building built in 1855-1856.
Application is to construct a building behind the facades of the
existing building and install new ground floor storefront infill.
HDC
strongly opposes this application to gut a mid-19th century, landmarked
building in order to build another structure within its shell. The
resulting “balconies” between two walls and rooms without
windows opening directly to the outside bring to mind the airshafts
and rooms whose windows only open onto other rooms of tenements.
The proposal would turn the original building into large parapet
walls raising a number of potential problems. The building's exterior
walls are not accustomed to being exposed to the elements on both
sides which may lead to new expansion and contraction issues. The
former interior side of the wall could develop moisture issues as
it will always be in shadow. There are also questions of support
and the possibility of shifting. We fear that, like Amster Yard,
this project is an accident waiting to happen. There is no true
need to reduce a landmarked building to a mere shell of itself and
risk the safety of what little is left.
2/5/2008
Item 28
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
BOROUGH OF BROOKLYN
084774- Block 2414, lot 1-
292-314 Kent Avenue - Individual Landmark Historic District
Three American round-arch style industrial buildings, designed by
Theodore A. Havemeyer and others and built in 1881-1884. Application
is to construct rooftop and rear additions, modify and create masonry
openings; and install bulkheads, mechanical equipment, windows,
ground floor infill, signage, a canopy and awnings.
While
there are many things we could comment on, such as the loss of the
other structures in the historic complex or the lack of illustrations
showing the altered landmark in context surrounded by towers as
planned, HDC will cut to the chase. If the proposed came to you
as an application for an individual landmark - a building overwhelmed
by five glass floors and enormous boxes of mechanicals on top, a
building whose fenestration has been completely altered due to new
masonry openings and window modifications, a building whose windows
had lost all their historic varying details, their lintels, their
sills and were now aluminum instead of wood, a building with strange
geometric bays, incongruous with the round-arched style factory,
jutting out of it – would this highly altered, differently
detailed, differently massed building be designated? If these changes
would make the building barely recognizable and unworthy of landmarking
(we have seen buildings less dramatically altered rejected by the
Commission or refused any Public Hearing at all), then these alterations
are not appropriate for an individual landmark that is designated.
HDC strongly urges you to reject this application and instead guide
a suitable restoration for the landmarked Domino Sugar Refinery.
2/5/2008
Item 18
CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN
078247- Block 822, lot 69-
52 West 21st Street - Ladies' Mile Historic District
A dwelling built in 1862 and converted to a commercial building
with a brick and iron façade designed by A. Siegal in 1910-1911.
Application is to alter the façade and install windows, a
cornice and new storefronts.

HDC appreciates the effort and expense
going into this project and look forward to the results. There are
some proportion issues though due to the fact that the store is
slightly below grade. There a number of possible ways to reduce
the awkwardness including returning the second floor bay window
as seen in the historic photo or reducing the sign band area in
order to lengthen the second floor windows. We also feel that there
is too much glass in the storefront, and a metal bulkhead and framing
around the doors and windows are needed. With some adjustments to
this proposal, 52 West 21st Street could become a charming contribution
to the Ladies’ Mile Historic District.
Click here
to access the full archive of HDC testimony
|