|
April 12, 2004
Statement of the Historic Districts Council
Before the Art Commission
Re: Item 21798, Installation of a Prototype
"Wrap" on Existing Double Telephone Kiosks, Manhattan
below 96th Street.
The Historic Districts Council is the advocate for
New York City’s designated historic districts and neighborhoods
meriting preservation. The core belief of the Historic Districts
Council is that the preservation and enhancement of New York City’s
historic resources – our neighborhoods, buildings, parks,
and public spaces – are central to the continued success of
the city. The Historic Districts Council wishes to voice our opposition
to the proposed advertising “wrap” for existing double
telephone kiosks. Our objection to the proposal is two-fold:
· First, the expanded advertising spaces
will have a detrimental impact on the aesthetics of New York
City’s streetscapes.
· Second, this proposal runs counter to proposed regulations
promulgated by other city agencies.
HDC has long been deeply concerned about the proliferation of public
pay telephones and their effect on New York City’s historic
neighborhoods. In the past five to ten years, New York City’s
sidewalks have been bombarded with a proliferation of public pay
telephones. Today’s public pay telephones are a jarring presence
in our historic streetscapes. They have become billboards plastered
throughout our neighborhoods, physically blocking our sidewalks
and visually cluttering our beautiful city.
The Titan telephone wrap is a clear indication that
telephone companies are more interested in advertising revenue than
providing a public service. Indeed, Titan’s proposed telephone
structures look more like big boxy advertising signs than telephones
that are supposedly on our sidewalks to provide a public service.
Public pay telephones should first and foremost look like telephones
and should not merely be structures for advertising.
Recently under the Bloomberg administration, several
city agencies have attempted to address the problem of the proliferation
of public pay telephones and their associated advertising. In January
2004, the Landmarks Preservation Commission proposed a rule to regulate
public pay telephones within historic districts and to forbid outright
telephones in front of individual landmarks. The Landmarks Preservation
Commission’s rule, when adopted, will also prohibit advertising
on the street-side panel of the telephone kiosks within historic
districts. More significantly, in February 2004, the Department
of Information Technology and Telecommunications (DoITT) proposed
a rule forbidding advertising on all new telephones below 110th
Street in Manhattan. The Historic Districts Council fully supports
DoITT’s rule because it will help ensure that Manhattan’s
neighborhoods are not further denigrated by inappropriate advertising
on public pay telephones.
Unfortunately, DoITT’s proposed rule does not correct the
problems created by the existing over-abundance of telephones and
their advertising panels. Titan’s proposed advertising wrap
before us today will make the existing telephone problem even worse
by increasing the amount of advertising space on the existing telephone
enclosures. The Art Commission cannot allow increased advertising
space on existing telephones while other city agencies are working
towards curtailing such advertising.
The Historic Districts Council urges the Art Commission
to deny Titan’s advertising wrap. In doing so, the Art Commission
would be supporting the concerned citizens and neighborhood groups
and even the Bloomberg administration in their fight to prevent
public pay telephones and their associated advertising from dominating
our streetscapes.
Return to Testimony Archives
|