February 17, 2009
Statement of the Historic Districts Council before the
Landmarks Preservation Commission
Certificate of Appropriateness Hearing
The Historic Districts Council is the advocate for New York City’s
designated historic districts and neighborhoods meriting preservation.
Its Public Review Committee monitors proposed changes within historic
districts and changes to individual landmarks and has reviewed
the following applications that were before the Commission.
Hearing Date: 2/17/2009
LPC Docket Number: 095577
Manhattan, Block: 1150, Lot: 37
118 West 79th Street - Upper West Side/Central Park West Historic
District
A neo-Romanesque style apartment building designed by Emery Roath
and built in 1925. Application is to alter window openings.
HDC Testimony
HDC does not find this proposal appropriate as it would alter
the intact window pattern and arrangement on Emery Roth’s
118 West 79th Street. Although this is a secondary fa?ade, it
is clearly visible over its shorter neighors. Approving this application
would set a precedent for changes to the window openings on the
other floors until the historic arrangement is completely lost.
The existing window configuration reflects the time of the building’s
design and construction when servants quarters were part of these
apartments. Although this may not be the case now, it is a bad
idea to let new interior use and configuration drive the external
appearance and changes to the historic design. HDC requests that
the Commission not approve this application.
LPC Determination: Incomplete
Hearing Date: 2/17/2009
LPC Docket Number: 096368
Brooklyn, Block: 2119, Lot: 9
305 Cumberland Street - Fort Greene Historic District
An Italianate style frame house built in 1851. Application is
to alter the rear fa?ade.
HDC Testimony
The addition of 305 Cumberland Street are charming, important
pieces of this rare 1851 framed house. HDC feels that too much
fabric is being removed from the additions’ rear walls only
to be replaced with large plate glass windows and doors with little
detail, leaving a blank facade. We ask that the glazing be scaled
down to fit more comfortably with the historic character and nature
of this home.
LPC Determination: Approved
Hearing Date: 2/17/2009
LPC Docket Number: 092831
Manhattan, Block: 222, Lot: 1
441-453 Greenwich Street - TriBeCa North Historic District
aka 34-48 Vestry Street and 9-17 Desbrosses Street, a Romanesque
Revival style warehouse designed by Charles C. Haight and built
in 1883-1884. Application is to replace paving and install lighting
at the sidewalk.
HDC Testimony
HDC finds the addition of cobble stones on this wide sidewalk
a welcomed alteration. We do though have issue with the up lights
at the trees which have no relation to anything in this historic
district. If lighting is an issue that must be addressed at this
location, HDC urges the applicant to work with staff to find another
way.
LPC Determination: Approved
Hearing Date: 2/17/2009
LPC Docket Number: 096148
Manhattan, Block: 1305, Lot: 1
109 East 50th Street - Individual Landmark Historic District
A Byzantine style church designed by Bertram Goodhue and built
in 1914-1919. Application is to install a stair enclosure at the
terrace.
HDC Testimony
While we understand the security issue at this location, HDC does
not find this to be an appropriate solution. The enclosure would
be visible from the street and clogs up the elegant terrace, an
integral piece of this individual landmark. We ask instead that
other, less intrusive options be investigated. For example, could
a bulkhead door flush to the ground work here? Is this stair well
and door absolutely necessary? Careful planning is required to
both protect this special building and meet the security requirements
of today. HDC urges that the plan be further thought out.
LPC Determination: Approved
Hearing Date: 2/17/2009
LPC Docket Number: 088307
Manhattan, Block: 1168, Lot: 8
243 West 76th Street - West End Collegiate Historic District
An Eclectic style rowhouse with Queen Anne and Romanesque style
details designed by William H. Boylan and built in 1889-1890.
Application is to remove an altered stoop and create a window
opening.
HDC Testimony
243 West 76th Street is an unusual case of a rowhouse that did
not completely lose its stoop when the entrance was moved to the
areaway. At a time when LPC and preservation advocates encourage
the reintroduction of long lost stoops, allowing the demolition
of one, even just pieces, would be counterproductive. HDC suggests
that the stoop be restored, the relic be stabilized and cleaned
up, or that reuse of the present configuration be found, such
as a balcony, but removal of so much historic fabric on the front
fa?ade of a landmarked building should not be an option. Instead
a little creativity and appreciation for the Eclectic style of
this rowhouse are called for here.
LPC Determination: Incomplete
Hearing Date: 2/17/2009
LPC Docket Number: 096388
Manhattan, Block: 1377, Lot: 15
690 Madison Avenue - Upper East Side Historic District
A neo-Grec style apartment building designed by J.H. Valentine
and built in 1878-1879. Application is to install a new storefront,
and alter the facade, create new window openings, and construct
a rooftop addition.
HDC Testimony
Many boards were missing from this application at public review
on Thursday, among them a proposed elevation of either the building
or the rooftop addition, a materials board and any explanation
of materials. From what boards we did have, HDC finds the general
design of the storefront appropriate and has no problem with the
rooftop addition based on the fact that it seems to be visible
minimally visible. We had questions as to whether the street side
wall was being stripped or repainted – the idea of stucco
never came to mind. If the wall can take another coat of paint,
that would be preferable to stucco. HDC does not find the addition
of large windows at the corner of the building on the upper floors
appropriate. Moving and adding windows seems like a lot of work,
work that the building does not necessarily need.
LPC Determination: Approved w/mods
Hearing Date: 2/3/2009
LPC Docket Number: 093663
Brooklyn, Block: 326, Lot: 24
15 Tompkins Place - Cobble Hill Historic District
A Greek Revival style rowhouse built in the 1840s. Application
is to construct a rear yard addition.
HDC Testimony
This is a special row within the Cobble Hill historic district,
noted in the designation report for its "pleasing variety
within a certain uniformity". This balance is reflected both
on the buildings' street facades as well as their rears. While
the rear of a building in any rowhouse district is important from
a planning and development point of view, the composition of these
buildings' rear yards was always an important aspect of their
design, as evidenced by the large depth of the lot. These buildings
were built before zoning or any codified concept of appropriate
lot coverage, so why didn’t the designers take more advantage
of their generous lots? It is obvious, from their design that
the vast open space in the back of thee buildings was intentional
and part of their original plan.
Therefore, the proposal to extend the back of the building by
7 on in some cases 10 feet violates the historic design principle
of not only this house, but the whole row. By penetrating the
rear open space in this way, this proposal is transforming this
Cobble Hill Greek Revival row house into something it is not and
it should not be allowed.
With regard to the actual design of the additions, the fenestration
pattern is frankly too generic and bland for a building of this
style. Historically, Greek Revival had much more interesting fenestration
than what is being offered. Especially when compared to the new
windows next door, these windows look rather corporate.
Finally, the staircase bulkhead is obviously visible, and placing
it atop the tallest building in a row will only make it stand
out more.
LPC Determination: Approved
Hearing Date: 2/3/2009
LPC Docket Number: 092948
Manhattan, Block: 520, Lot: 85
5 King Street - Charlton-King-Vandam Historic District
An Anglo-Italianate style apartment building built in 1846. Application
is to alter the fa?ade, install a new storefront, and install
a barrier-free access ramp.
HDC Testimony
While HDC does not have any major issues with the majority of
this application, we were concerned about the three new window
openings on the southern end of the fa?ade. They seem discordant
to the new openings to the north, and we would strongly recommend
that they be rethought to better fit with those openings.
LPC Determination: Approved
Return to Recent Testimony